Preview

Surgut State Pedagogical University Bulletin

Advanced search

Communicative Competence of a Teacher: Criterial-Diagnostic Instrumentation

https://doi.org/10.26105/SSPU.2022.76.1.006

Abstract

Educational activity is directly or indirectly mediated by the communicative one. The adoption of the ideas of inclusive education not only expands the number of subjects of the educational field, but also complicates all communication activities. All this requires a higher level of formation of communicative competence among modern pedagogical workers. In addition, communicative competence is important for a teacher not only as a component of his professional competence, but as a foundation for the formation of other competencies. That is why it is important to diagnose this competence in students of pedagogical specialties. This article proposes criterial-diagnostic tools for determining the level of formation of communicative competence.

About the Author

M. L. Krivut

Russian Federation


References

1. Bol’shoj enciklopedicheskij slovar’ [Big Encyclopedic Dictionary] /Pod obshch. red. A. M. Prohorova. M. :Bol’shaya Rossijskaya enciklopediya, 2000. 1456 s.(In Russian).

2. Dolgova V.I., Mel’nik E. V. Empatiyai kommunikativnayakompetentnost’ [Empathy and communicative competence]. CHelyabinsk: ATOKSO, 2007. 253 s.(In Russian).

3. ZHerebkina V. F. Formirovanie pedagogicheskoj kommunikativnoj kompetentnosti budushchih uchitelej v processe obucheniya v vuze [Formation of pedagogical communicative competence of future teachers in the process of studying at the university]: Dis. ... kand. ped. nauk. 13.00.08 CHelyabinsk, 2001. 189 s.(In Russian).

4. ZHizneva N. V. Kommunikativnaya kompetentnost’ pedagoga kak uslovie effektivnog opsihologicheskogo soprovozhdeniya razvitiya mladshih shkol’nikov s narusheniyami rechi: avtoref. na soiskanie uchenoj stepeni kandidata psihologicheskih nauk [Communicative competence of a teacher as a condition for effective psychological support of the development of younger schoolchildren with speech disorders] 19.00.13. Rostov na Donu. 2011. 25s. (In Russian).

5. Kodzhaspirov A. YU., Kodzhaspirova G. M. Pedagogicheskij slovar’ [Pedagogical Dictionary] M.: Akademiya, 2003. 176 s.(In Russian).

6. Koncepciya razvitiya inklyuzivnogo obrazovaniya lic s osobennostyami psihofizicheskogo razvitiya v Respublike Belarus’ [Communicative competence of an inclusive education teacher: structural components and levels of development] // Specyyal’nay aadukacyya. 2015. № 5. S. 3–10.(In Russian).

7. Kostromina S. N., Rean A. A. Kommunikativnaya kompetentnost’ pedagoga kak faktoru speshnosti ego diagnosticheskoj deyatel’nosti [The concept of development of inclusive education of persons with special needs of psychophysical development in the Republic of Belarus] // Psihologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie. 2007 № 3 S. 77–86.(In Russian).

8. Krivut’ M. L. Kommunikativnaya kompetentnost’ pedagoga inklyuzivnogo obrazovaniya: strukturnye komponenty i urovni razvitiya [Communicative competence of a teacher as a factor of success of his diagnostic activity] // Vestnik BarGU. 2019. Vyp.7. S.45–53(In Russian).

9. Ovsyannikova E. K., Maruhno V. M. Kommunikativnaya kompetentnost’ prepodavatelya vysshej shkoly kak factor effektivnosti uchebno-vospitatel’nogo processa [Communicative competence of a high school teacher as a factor of the effectiveness of the educational process] // Mezhdunarodnyj zhurnal eksperimental’nogo obrazovaniya. 2015. № 4. S. 186–187. URL: http://expeducation.ru/ru/article/view?id=6919 (data obrashcheniya: 04.03.2020).(In Russian).

10. Sobchik L. N. Diagnostika mezhlichnostnyh otnoshenij :Modificir. variant interperson. diagnostiki T. Liri [Diagnostics of interpersonal relations : Modified. interpersonal variant. diagnostics of T. Leary]: metod. rukovodstvo — M. : MKC GU po trudu i social’nym voprosam Mosgorispolkoma, 1990. 48 s. (In Russian).

11. .Solov’eva O. A. Gotovnost’ pedagogov k inklyuzivnomu obucheniyuu chashchihsya s OPFR v uchrezhdeniyah professional’nogo obrazovaniya [Teachers’ readiness for inclusive education of students with an OPFR in vocational education institutions] // Professional’noe obrazovanie. № 1(23). 2016. S. 9–14. (In Russian).

12. .Tishchenko V. A. Kommunikativnye umeniya: k voprosu klassifikacii [Communication skills: on the issue of classification] // KPZH. 2008. №2. URL:: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/kommunikativnye-umeniya-k-voprosu-klassifikatsii (data obrashcheniya 31.07.2018).(In Russian).

13. Fetiskin N. P., Kozlov V. V., Manujlov G. M. Social’no-psihologicheskaya diagnostika razvitiya lichnosti i malyhg rupp [Socio-psychological diagnostics of the development of personality and small groups]. M. :Izd-vo In-ta Psihoterapii, 2002. 488s.(In Russian).

14. Hitryuk V. V. Kommunikativnyj component inklyuzivnoj gotovnosti budushchih pedagogov: sushchnost’, vektory, kriterii i pokazateli sformirovannosti [The communicative component of inclusive readiness of future teachers: the essence, vectors, criteria and indicators of formation] / HІV Mezhdunarodnaya nauchno-prakticheskaya konferenciya «Psihologo-pedagogicheskie problem razvitiya lichnosti professionala v usloviyah universitetskogo obrazovaniya» [Sb. st.] Kitten (Bolgariya), 2014. S.484–490

15. Shadrikov V. D. Bazovye kompetencii pedagogicheskoj deyatel’nosti [Basic competencies of pedagogical activity] // Sibirskij uchitel’. Novosibirsk, 2007. N 6. S. 5–15.(In Russian).


Review

For citations:


Krivut M.L. Communicative Competence of a Teacher: Criterial-Diagnostic Instrumentation. Surgut State Pedagogical University Bulletin. 2022;(1 (76)):50-56. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26105/SSPU.2022.76.1.006

Views: 208


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2078-7626 (Print)