The Use of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCS) in Higher Education Institutions (Using the Example of TIU): Pro et Contra
https://doi.org/10.69571/SSPU.2024.91.4.019
Abstract
The study examines the possibilities and prospects of using mass open online courses (MOOCS) in higher education institutions on the example of Tyumen Industrial University. The authors analyze the formation stages of MOOC; study the advantages of introducing MOOC into the educational process, such as accessibility, flexibility and individualization of learning. The paper provides specific examples of the use of online courses in the university curriculum aimed at the successful integration of MOOCs into the educational system; the challenges and problems associated with the massive introduction of online courses. The authors conclude that the use of MOOC contributes to expanding access to educational resources and increasing the competitiveness of the university in the educational market.
About the Authors
V. V. Yudashkina
Industrial University of Tyumen
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Yudashkina Valentina Vladimirovna — Senior Lecturer, Foreign Language Department
O. E. Yatsevich
Industrial University of Tyumen
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Yatsevich Olga Evgenevna — PhD (Philosophy Sciences), Associate Professor, Associate Professor Foreign Language department
V. V. Isakov
Industrial University of Tyumen
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Isakov Vasilii Vladimirovich — Leading specialist of the Department of E-learning and Distance Learning Technologies, Institute of Additional and Distance Education;
Senior Lecturer at the Department of Physics and Instrumentation
References
1. Ibatova A.Z., Il'in A.G. Izuchenie jeffektivnosti mook v sovremennom obrazovatel'nom prostranstve [Studying the effectiveness of MOOCs in the modern educational space] // Azimut nauchnyh issledovanij: pedagogika i psihologija. 2019. T. 8. № 1 (26). S. 126–127. (In Russian).
2. Ivanov P.D., Bojko T.A. Identifikacija faktorov, vlijajushhih na uspeshnost' obuchenija na MOOC-kursah [Identification of factors influencing the success of MOOC courses] // Jekonomika i upravlenie: problemy, reshenija. 2019. T. 5. № 12. S. 55–64. (In Russian).
3. Menciev A.U., Dauletukaeva K.D. Mook kak novyj instrument distancionnogo obrazovanija: pedagogicheskaja osnova mook, problemy i ogranichenija [Mooc as a new tool of distance education: the pedagogical basis of MOOC, problems and limitations]. CITISJe. 2019. № 2 (19). S. 33. (In Russian) .
4. Roshhina Ja.M., Roshhin S.Ju., Rudakov V.N. Spros na massovye otkrytye onlajn-kursy (MOOC) opyt rossijskogo obrazovanija [Demand for mass open online courses (MOOC) the experience of Russian education] // Voprosy obrazovanija. 2018. № 1. S. 174199. (In Russian).
5. Iacevich O.E., Speranskaja N.I., Omelaenko N.V., Iudashkina V.V., Shabatura L.N. Realizacija individual'nyh obrazovatel'nyh traektorij v vysshih uchebnyh zavedenijah [Implementation of individual educational trajectories in higher education institutions] // Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii. 2024. T. 33. № 5. S. 150168. (In Russian).
6. Gianni Renda, Blair Kuys. Connectivism as a Pedagogical Model within Industrial Design Education // Procedia Technology. Volume 20. 2015. Pр. 15–19. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.protcy.2015.07.004. (data obrashheniya: 28.07.2024). (In English).
7. Hall R., & Winn J. Mass intellectuality and democratic leadership in higher education. 2017. London: Bloomsbury. (In English).
8. Hao Huang, Lihjen Jew, Dandan Qi Take a MOOC and then drop: A systematic review of MOOC engagement pattern and dropout factor. Heliyon. Vol. 9. Issue 4. 2023. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15220. (data obrashheniya:12.06.2024). (In English).
9. Koller D., Ng A., Do C., Chen Z. Retention and intention in massive open online courses // Educause Review Online. June 3. 2013. URL: https://er.educause.edu/articles/2013/6/retention-and-intentionin-massive-open-online-courses. (data obrashheniya: 22.08.2024). (In English).
10. Lazarus J. Hacking the MOOC: Towards a Postdigital Pedagogy of Critical Hope // Postdigital Science and Education. 2019. 1 (2). Pp. 391–412. (In English).
11. Porter S. What are MOOCs? To MOOC or Not to MOOC. Chandos Publishing, 2015. Pp. 1–7. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100048-9.00001-9. (data obrashheniya: 08.07.2024). (In English).
12. Shu Li, Yuan Zhao, Longjiang Guo, Meirui Ren, Jin Li, Lichen Zhang, Keqin Li Quantification and prediction of engagement: Applied to personalized course recommendation to reduce dropout in MOOCs // Information Processing & Management. Vol. 61. Issue 1. 2024. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2023.103536. (data obrashheniya: 18.06.2024). (In English).
13. Sorokina E.I., Gambeeva Yu.N., Glotova A.V., Litvak L.D. Factors affecting MOOC retention rates // Izvestia: Herzen University Journal of Humanities & Sciences. 2020. № 196. Pp. 194–202. (In English).
Review
For citations:
Yudashkina V.V., Yatsevich O.E., Isakov V.V. The Use of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCS) in Higher Education Institutions (Using the Example of TIU): Pro et Contra. Surgut State Pedagogical University Bulletin. 2024;(4(91)):156-164. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.69571/SSPU.2024.91.4.019
Views:
129
Email this article 