The Quality of Higher Education in Assessments of the Subjects of the Educational Process (on the Example of Empirical Studies in KHMAO — Yugra)
https://doi.org/10.26105/SSPU.2023.82.1.007
Abstract
The article deals with the issues of assessing the quality of higher education by the subjects of the educational process. The results of a sociological study conducted in the Khanty-Mansiysk Autonomous Okrug — Yugra are presented. A model for representing the quality of higher education by the subjects of the educational process of Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Okrug — Yugra is proposed.
Supporting agencies: The research was carried out within the framework of the state task for science of the Surgut State Pedagogical University for 2021–2023 on the topic «Dynamics of social well-being of young people in the conditions of the North: the Ugra cross-section in the context of all-Russian trends».
About the Authors
D. I. Bogdan
Surgut State Pedagogical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Bogdan Daria Ivanovna — Head of the Department for Monitoring the Quality of Education
O. V. Vlasova
Surgut State Pedagogical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Vlasova Olga Vladimirovna — Ph.D. (Sociology), Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of Socio-Economic Education and Philosophy, Vice-Rector for Research
V. P. Zasypkin
Surgut State Pedagogical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Zasypkin Vladislav Pavlovich — Doctor of Sociology, Associate Professor, Rector
N. V. Konoplina
Surgut State Pedagogical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Konoplina Nadezhda Vasilyevna — Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences, Professor, President of Surgut State Pedagogical University
References
1. Balackij E. V. Institucional'nye konflikty v sfere vysshego obrazovanija [Institutional conflicts in higher education] // Jekonomika obrazovanija. 2007. № 3. S. 79–89. (In Russian).
2. Giddens Je. Sociologija [Sociology] / pri uchastii K. Berdsoll: per. s angl. Izd. 2‑e, polnost'ju pererab. i dop. M.: Editorial URSS, 2005. S. 619. (In Russian).
3. Darendorf R. Jelementy teorii social'nogo konflikta [Elements of the theory of social conflict] / per. s nem. V. M. Stepanenkovoj // Sociologicheskie issledovanija. 1994. № 5. S. 142–147. (In Russian).
4. Drugova E. A. Priroda konflikta administratorov i nauchno-pedagogicheskih rabotnikov v rossijskih vuzah [The nature of the conflict of administrators and scientific and pedagogical workers in Russian universities] // Universitetskoe upravlenie6: praktika i analiz. 2018. T.22. № 2. 72–82. (In Russian).
5. Zborovskij G. E., Ambarova P. A. Sociologija vysshego obrazovanija [Sociology of higher education]. Monografija. Ekaterinburg: Gumanitarnyj universitet, 2019. (In Russian).
6. Zdravomyslov A. G. Sociologija konflikta: Rossija na putjah preodolenija krizisa [Sociology of Conflict: Russia on ways to overcome the crisis]. Uchebnoe posobie. M.: Aspekt-press, 1995. 320 s. (In Russian).
7. Ivanova V. A., Osipov A. M. Teorii konflikta v sovremennoj sociologii obrazovanija [Theories of conflict in modern sociology of education] // Vestnik Novgorodskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2005. № 31. S. 71–73. (In Russian).
8. Fursova V.V., Gorbachjova O. V. Sociologija obrazovanija kak otrasl' sociologicheskogo znanija: sravnitel'nyj analiz rossijskogo i zarubezhnogo obrazovatel'nogo diskursa [Sociology of education as a branch of sociological knowledge: comparative analysis of Russian and foreign educational discourse] // Sociologicheskaja nauka i social'naja praktika. 2015. № 2(10). S. 88–111. (In Russian).
9. Sheregi F.Je. Disfunkcional'nost' rossijskogo professional'nogo obrazovanija [Dysfunctionality of Russian vocational education] // Trud i social'nye otnoshenija. 2009. № 12. S.23–31. (In Russian).
Review
For citations:
Bogdan D.I., Vlasova O.V., Zasypkin V.P., Konoplina N.V. The Quality of Higher Education in Assessments of the Subjects of the Educational Process (on the Example of Empirical Studies in KHMAO — Yugra). Surgut State Pedagogical University Bulletin. 2023;(1 (82)):69-79. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26105/SSPU.2023.82.1.007
Views:
131
Email this article 