National Traditions in the Educational Potential of the Digital Socio-Cultural Space of Students

The mechanisms of the formation of the values of the national culture of modern students are studied, the elements of the educational potential of the “digitized” and real socio-cultural space are considered. The symbols of modern cinema are analyzed. The transformation of the deep meanings of Russian national symbols in Western film production, the acquisition of new symbols in modern Russian animation is noted. Based on the materials of mass questionnaire surveys and content analysis of students’ personal pages in social networks in 2020–2022 the characteristics of social interaction both in the community itself and with the community of teachers are revealed: attitude to interaction with the help of gadgets, changes in the structure of personal contacts in the real world and in social networks, duration and forms of contacts. As a significant factor in the dynamics of digitalization of the culture of the student community, long-term self-isolation during the pandemic is taken into account. The preferences of students in the world and Russian cinematography are revealed. The significant destructive potential of samples of Western film distribution chosen by students, the educational potential of modern Russian cinema are shown. The disappearance of a clear spatial localization of the layers of the actual culture and the emergence of the effect of their collaboration both in form and content are recorded. Conclusions are drawn about the significant role of digital content in the formation of cultural preferences, the value system of modern student youth, community solidarity and the system of community actions. The insufficient role of the community of university teachers in network interaction with students is substantiated, which reduces the possibility of transferring cultural capital between communities.

1. Byliny [Epics]. Selivanova F. M. (Comp., entry. Art., prepared. texts and comments). 1998. M.: Publishing House Soviet Russia. 570 s. (In Russian).

2. Gromova O. Ol’ga Gromova: Sakharnyy Rebonok [Olga Gromova: Sugar Baby: video]. URL: https://clck.ru/s3uwB (data obrashheniya 07.05.2022).

3. Danilevsky N. Ya. Zakat Yevropy. Rossiya i Yevropa [Decline of Europe. Russia and Europe]. M.: Book PH, 1991. 573 s. (In Russian).

4. Egorychev A. M., Rostovskaya T. K. & Kretinin A. S. Dukhovnost’ russkoy kul’tury kak bazovyy faktor novoy GMP Rossii [Spirituality of Russian culture as a basic factor of the new SYP of Russia] // TsITISE. 2018. No. 1. Vol. 14. S. 26–29. (In Russian).

5. Zubok Yu. A. & Chuprov V. I. Kul’tura v zhizni molodezhi: potrebnost’, interes, tsennost’ [Culture in the life of youth: need, interest, value] // Bulletin of the Institute of Sociology (Vestnik Instituta sotziologii). 2018. Vol. 9. No. 4. S. 170–191. (In Russian).

6. Zubok Yu. A. & Chuprov V. I. Samoregulyatsiya smyslozhiznennykh tsennostey v kul’turnom prostranstve molodozhi [Self-regulation of meaningful life values in the cultural space of youth] // Bulletin of the Institute of Sociology (Vestnik Instituta sotziologii). 2019. No. 4. Vol. 10. S. 164–186. (In Russian).

7. Ilyin V. V. Postklassicheskoye obshchestvoznaniye: kakim yemu byt’? [Postclassical social science: what should it be like?] // Sociological Studies. 1992. No. 10. S. 39–42. (In Russian).

8. Magranov A. S. & Detochenko L. S. Grazhdanskaya identichnost’ sovremennoy studencheskoy molodezhi: osobennosti i faktory transformatsii [Civil identity of modern student youth: features and factors of transformation] // Sociological Studies. 2018. No. 8. S. 108–116. (In Russian).

9. Kim V. V. (ed.). Mirovozzreniye i kul’tura [Worldview and culture: collection of articles]. Russian Philosophical Society, etc. Yekaterinburg: Bank of Cultural Information, 2002. 384 s. (In Russian).

10. Narkhov D. Yu., Narkhova E. N. & Shkurin D. V. Dinamika obrazovatel’noy aktivnosti studenchestva pod vozdeystviyem tsifrovizatsii [Dynamics of educational activity of students under the influence of digitalization] // Obrazovanie i nauka. 2021. Vol. 23. No. 8. S. 147–188. (In Russian).

11. Remizova M. N. Interpretatsiya ponyatiya «sotsiokul’turnoye prostranstvo» v klassicheskoy sotsiologii [Interpretation of the concept of “sociocultural space” in classical sociology] // Historical, philosophical, political and legal sciences, cultural studies and art history. Questions of theory and practice. 2010. No. 10. S. 158–162. (In Russian).

12. Savitskaya T. E. Virtual’naya Rossiya: novaya sotsial’naya ontologiya, novyy kul’turnyy praksis [Virtual Russia: a new social ontology, a new cultural praxis] // Kul’tura Rossii, 2000‑ye gody [Culture of Russia, 2000s] (Abankina T. V. and others; resp. ed. E. P. Kostina). St. Petersburg: Aleteyya, 2012. S. 740–764. (In Russian).

13. Dmitrievsky V. N. and others; Zhidkov V. S. & Klyavina T. A. (resp. ed.). Sotsiologiya iskusstva: uchebnik dlya studentov vuzov, obuchayushchikhsya po spetsial’nosti 050400 Teatrovedeniye [Sociology of art: a textbook for university students studying in the specialty 050400 Theater Studies]. St. Petersburg: Art-SPb, 2005. 477 s. (In Russian).

14. Vishnevsky Yu. R. (ed.). STUDENT 1995–2016 gg.: dinamika sotsiokul’turnogo razvitiya studenchestva Srednego Urala [STUDENT 1995–2016: the dynamics of the socio-cultural development of students in the Middle Urals]. Monograph. Yekaterinburg: Ural federal university, 2017. 904 s. (In Russian).

15. Benedict Ruth. Patterns of Culture. Boston, New York, Houghton, Mifflin and Company, 1934. 260 p. (In English).