Subjective Assessment of Social Distance in Relation to Migrants in Modern Russia
https://doi.org/10.69571/SSPU.2025.98.5.009
Abstract
The attitude towards migrants is determined by the host society’s perspective on social reality. This allows us to identify a specific type of interaction between these two categories and the dialectics of their relationship. The purpose of this study is to examine the attitude towards migrants, its dynamics, and key aspects of its manifestation in order to determine the level of social distance as a factor in the stability of interethnic relations in Russian society. The research methodology is based on a synthesis of economic and sociocultural approaches, which allows us to analyze this issue from the point of view of the relationship between environmental conditions and a subjective assessment of events. It is established that the prevalence of positive assessments of migration does not contribute to reducing the social distance towards this social group, especially in a number of social groups (young people, low-income citizens, and active Internet users). The factors influencing Russians’ attitudes towards migration are individual characteristics, place of residence, and sociocultural attitudes. The study’s findings highlight the need for a comprehensive approach to migrant integration, which includes socio-political, educational, and information measures aimed at improving their perception.
About the Authors
E. N. GogolevaRussian Federation
Gogoleva Elena Nikolaevna — Candidate of Sociology, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department Sociology and Political Sciences
V. O. Belyaeva
Russian Federation
Tula State University
A. S. Lazareva
Russian Federation
Lazareva Anastasia Sergeevna — Student in Sociology
References
1. Babaeva M.V., Konstantinov V.V. Adaptatsionnyy protsess i sotsialnaya distantsiya trudovykh migrantov v prinimayushchem soobshchestve [Adaptation process and social distance of labor migrants in the receiving community] // Chelovecheskiy kapital. 2021. N 3(147). S. 81–87. (In Russian).
2. «Vo vsekh tyazhkikh: chislo sovershennykh inostrantsami prestupleniy vyroslo na 15%» [“In all seriousness: the number of crimes committed by foreigners has increased by 15%”] // Izvestiya Sledstvennogo komiteta RF ot 20.05.2025. URL: https://sledcom.ru/press/smi/item/1984509/?pdf=1 (data obrashcheniya: 25.07.2025). (In Russian).
3. Vorob’eva O.D., Rubina A. E. Podkhody k otsenke vklada trudovykh migrantov v ekonomiku prinimayushchey strany [Approaches to assessing the contribution of migrant workers to the economy of the host country]. Uroven zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii. 2023. T. 19. N 4. S. 591–601. (In Russian).
4. Konstantinov V. V., Osin R. V., Babaeva M. V., Klimova E. A., Bedrina E. B., Kirdyashova E. V. V chuzhoy strane: Sotsialno-psikhologicheskaya adaptatsiya trudovykh migrantov v Rossii [In a Foreign Country: Socio-Psychological Adaptation of Labor Migrants in Russia]. M.: Pero, 2022. 185 s. (In Russian).
5. Gogoleva E.N. Sotsialnaya identichnost v sotsiologicheskom diskurse: teoretiko-metodologicheskiy analiz [Social identity in sociological discourse: theoretical and methological analysis]. Vestnik Surgutskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta, 2023. N 5 (86). S. 218–226. (In Russian).
6. Immigratsiya v Rossiyu: blago ili vred (2019 g.). VCIOM. [Immigration to Russia: Good or Bad. VTsIOM]. Massovyy opros. Ob”em vyborochnoy sovokupnosti — 2000 chelovek. URL: https://wciom.ru/analyticalreviews/analiticheskii-obzor/immigracziya-v-rossiyu-blago-ili-vred?ysclid=mgmaw3jqj4926011207 (data obrashcheniya: 11.10.2025). (In Russian).
7. Mezhnatsionalnye otnosheniya i problema immigratsii. VCIOM. [Interethnic relations and the problem of immigration.VTsIOM]. Telefonnyy opros. Ob”em vyborochnoy sovokupnosti — 1600 chelovek. URL: https://wciom.ru/analytical-reviews/analiticheskii-obzor/mezhnacionalnye-otnoshenija-i-problema-immigracii?ysclid=mdhjf2q4ab364066490 (data obrashcheniya: 11.10.2025). (In Russian).
8. Merton R. Sotsialnaya teoriya i struktura [Social theory and social structure]. M.: ACT: ACT MOSKVA: KHRA-NITEL, 2006. 873 s. (In Russian).
9. Mukomel’ V. Migratsionnaya situatsiya i migranty v vospriyatii rossiyan [Migration situation and migrants in the perception of Russians]. Vestnik Rossiyskoy natsii. 2021. N 1–2. S. 53–68. (In Russian).
10. Sotsialno-ekonomicheskoe polozhenie Rossii: doklady 2023 g., 2024 g. [Russia’s Socio-Economic Situation: Reports for 2023 and 2024]. Ofitsialnyy sayt Federal’noy sluzhby gosudarstvennoy statistiki. URL: https://rosstat.gov.ru/storage/mediabank/Pril_Dok_06–2025.htm (data obrashcheniya: 25.07.2025). (In Russian).
11. Habermas J. Teoriya kommunikativnoy deyatel’nosti [The theory of communicative action]. Perevod s nem. A.K. Sudakova. M.: Izdatel’stvo «Ves’ Mir», 2022. 880 s. (In Russian).
12. Shustov A.V. Etnicheskie migratsii, formirovanie anklavov i etnopoliticheskie riski v stolichnom regione Rossii [Ethnic migrations, enclave formation and ethnopolitical risks in the Russian capital region]. Vestnik RUDN. Seriya: Politologiya. 2025. N 2. S. 378–397. (In Russian).
13. Lalonde R., Topel R. Economic impact of international migration and the economic performance of migrants. In: Handbook of Population and Family Economics. Ct. 14. Vol. 1. Part B. Michigan State University, University of Chicago; 1997. P. 799–850. (In English).
Review
For citations:
Gogoleva E.N., Belyaeva V.O., Lazareva A.S. Subjective Assessment of Social Distance in Relation to Migrants in Modern Russia. Surgut State Pedagogical University Bulletin. 2025;(5(99)):96-104. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.69571/SSPU.2025.98.5.009











