Mastering the legal components of the content of the architect’s social and communicative competence
https://doi.org/10.69571/SSPU.2025.94.1.007
Abstract
Architecture researchers identify the uniqueness and recognizability of the urban en- vironment as factors of its sustainable development. And this indicates the importance of creating original architectural objects, the inadmissibility of borrowing other people’s ideas when designing, the importance of the ability to find arguments in defense of the originality of one’s project, defend the rights to the results of one’s activities and respect intellectual property rights in architecture. At the same time, the opinion of architects and society about originality does not always coincide.
The research materials are the experience of the business game «Twins and Clones», developed and tested at the International Architectural Congress in the fall of 2024. Senior students from five architectural schools in Moscow participated in the game. The competition was held between pairs of teams who made presentations. The discussions used the method of provocation: teams of students were asked to prove opposing points of view: the originality or identity of pairs (triads) of architectural objects. The evaluation of the results was carried out by means of a written questionnaire of students and an expert assessment of the jury members.
The results of the survey showed that more than two thirds of the participants, as a result of participating in the «Gemini and Clones» business game, gained experience in publicly protecting architectural works and reached the average level of socio- regulatory skills of an architect. Their performance is on average 15–17% better than that of the control group of students.
A methodology for writing scenarios for problematic situations in architecture was proposed and tested, modeling social conflicts of a legal nature in architecture and forming the socio- regulatory skills of a future architect.
About the Author
I. V. Topchiy
Moscow Architectural Institute (State Academy)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Topchiy Irina Vladimirovna — Candidate (Architecture), Director of Preparatory Courses
References
1. Belyaeva A. V., Yanova M. G. K opredeleniyu ponyatiya “komandnaya rabota” (na osnove opy`ta medicinskogo vuza) [On the definition of the concept of “teamwork” (based on the experience of a medical university)] // Vestnik Surgutskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta. 2022. N4 (79). S. 24–31. (In Russian).
2. Gabeeva K. A., Serikov V. V. Formirovanie opy`ta verbal`nogo samovy`razheniya u obuchayushhixsya sredstvami inoyazy`chnogo monologa [Formation of students’ experience of verbal self-expression by means of a foreign monologue] // Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: problemy` vy`sshego obrazovaniya. 2020. N 4. S.36–40. (In Russian).
3. Doxoyan A. M. Realizaciya praktiko-orientirovannogo podxoda v vuze v sootvetstvii s FGOS VO [Implementation of a practice-oriented approach in higher education in accordance with the Federal State Educational Standard for Higher Education]. Vestnik Armavirskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta. 2018. N 2. T. 1. S. 5–14. (In Russian).
4. Elkina I. M. O roli i formax samoocenki studentov pri ocenke rezul`tatov obucheniya [On the role and forms of students’ self-assessment in assessing learning outcomes] // Cennosti i smy`sly`. 2012. N 6(22). S. 122–134. (In Russian).
5. Zasuxina I. B. Formirovanie professional`no-lichnostny`x motivov izucheniya inostrannogo yazy`ka u studentov texnicheskogo kolledzha [Formation of professional and personal motives for learning a foreign language among students of a technical college] / Diss. kand. ped. nauk. M., 2021, 158 s., s. 63–64. (In Russian).
6. Kovaleva N. B. Syuzhetno-deyatel`nostny`e texnologii v mediaobrazovanii: Monografiya [Plot-activity technologies in media education]/ M., MPGU. 2015. 204 s. S. 61–83. (In Russian).
7. Kozhevnikova I. D. Primenenie metodov praktiko-orientirovannogo obucheniya inostrannomu yazy`ku pri formirovanii gotovnosti k professional`nomu obshheniyu u budushhix specialistov transportnoj otrasli [Application of practiceoriented foreign language teaching methods in the formation of readiness for professional communication among future specialists in the transport industry] // Colloquium-journal. 2019. N19 (43). S. 99–101. (In Russian).
8. Korotich A. V. Arxitekturny`e «bliznecy»: problema oxrany` avtorskix prav na proizvedeniya arxitektury [Architectural “twins”: the problem of copyright protection for architectural works] // Akademicheskij vestnik UralNIIproekt RAASN. 2010. N3. S. 46–50. (In Russian).
9. Portnova T. Yu. Provokaciya kak pedagogicheskij priem dlya razvitiya navy`kov kriticheskogo my`shleniya na zanyatiyax po inostrannomu yazy`ku v texnicheskom vuze [Provocation as a pedagogical technique for developing critical thinking skills in foreign language classes at a technical university] // Crede Experto: transport, obshhestvo, obrazovanie, yazy`k. 2024. N 1. C. 195–205. URL: https://journals.rcsi.science/2312–1327/article/view/254506 (data obrashheniya: 04.02.2025). (In Russian).
10. Topchiy I. V. Scenarnoe proektirovanie pravovy`x situacij v arxitekturnoj deyatel`nosti [Scenario design of legal situations in architectural activity]// Obrazovanie. Nauka. Nauchny`e kadry`. 2024. N 3. S. 299–308. (In Russian).
11. Topchiy I. V. Tipologiya situacii formirovaniya social`no-kommunikativnoj kompetencii arxitektora [Typology of the situation of formation of socio-communicative competence of an architect] // Kazanskij pedagogicheskij zhurnal. 2023. N3. S. 108–117. (In Russian).
12. Turlakova O. E. Umeniya vnutrikomandnogo vzaimodejstviya studentov v proektnoj deyatel`nosti [Skills of intra-team interaction of students in project activities] // Cennosti i smy`sly`. 2022. N 6 (82). S.152–167. (In Russian).
13. Ty`chinina E. I. Formirovanie kompetentnosti vnutrikomandnogo vzaimodejstviya u bakalavrov e`konomicheskogo profilya [Formation of competence of intra-team interaction among bachelors of economics]/ Diss. kand. ped. nauk. M., 2021. 175 s., s. 75. (In Russian).
14. Kadam Dipali, Pusawale Swati. Task Based Approach: An Approach to Develop Writing Skills In English of Engineering Students Leads to Effective Communication Skills // Journal of Engineering Education Transformations. 2023. N 37. Pp. 62–69. (In English).
15. Sroufe R., Clauss B. University Campuses: Living laboratories for transformational programs // Breakthroughs in Sustainable Business Education. Routledge. 2025. Pp. 90–107. (In English).
Review
For citations:
Topchiy I.V. Mastering the legal components of the content of the architect’s social and communicative competence. Surgut State Pedagogical University Bulletin. 2025;(1(94)):67-78. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.69571/SSPU.2025.94.1.007
Views:
29
Email this article 