Thnophaulisms in the Context of Associative Experiment (Representation of Student Youth)
https://doi.org/10.26105/SSPU.2023.86.5.021
Abstract
The paper is devoted to the semantic analysis of the stereotypical images of some certain ethnic groups. The research task is to define some key attributive groups — nuclear of these stereotypical images and to reveal ethnophaulisms in the structure of the images as the markers of the hate speech. The elements of the associative experiment were used as research method. As a result, the author highlights student youth’s stereotypical images of certain ethnic groups, in which some ethnophaulisms of all-Russian conveyance as the markers of hate speech typical for everyday discourse are revealed. The author concludes that the expressive ethnonyms are not included in active student youth’s vocabulary, the cases of their usage are based upon some social stereotypes, are used unconsciously mostly, not to insult a representative of alien ethnos. Moreover, their usage is not always proportional to a negative image of ethnos in respondents’ consciousness.
References
1. Grischenko A. I. Istochniki vozniknoveniya ekspressivnyh etnonimov (etnofolizmov) v sovremennom russkom i anglijskom yazykah: etimologicheskij, motivacionnyj i derivacionnyj aspekty [Sources of expressive ethnonyms (ethnophaulisms) in contemporary Russian and English] // Aktivnye processy v sovremennoj leksike i frazeologii: Materialy mezhdunarodnoj konferencii 2007 g. pamyati L.V. Nikolenkoi YU.P. Soloduba (MPGU) / gl.red. N.A. Nikolina. M., YAroslavl': Remder, 2007. S.40–52. (In Russian).
2. Driga S. S. Vyyavlenie stereotipnyh obrazov «russkij», «migrant» (opyt leksiko-semanticheskogo eksperimenta) [Definition of the steriotipical images «Russian», «Migrant» (lexico-semantic experiment’s experience]// Vestnik Surgutskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta. 2015. № 4(37). S. 122–132 (In Russian).
3. Zalevskaya A. A. Psiholingvisticheskie issledovaniya. Slovo. Tekst: izbrannye Trudy [Psycholinguistic researches. Word. Text: selected works]. M.: Gnozis, 2005. 543 (In Russian).
4. Zaharchenko S. S. Etnofolizmy v spornyhtekstah. Popytka tipologizacii [Ethnophaulisms in controversial texts. Attempts of typologisation] // Filologicheskij vestnik Surgutskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta. № 4 (12), 2022. S.33–44 (In Russian).
5. Karaulov YU. N. Tipy kommunikativnogo povedeniya nositelya yazyka v situacii lingvisticheskogo eksperimenta [Types of communicative behaviour of a native speaker in a situation of linguistic experiment] // Etnokul'turnaya specifika yazykovogo soznaniya: sb. statej / otv. red. N.V. Ufimceva. M.: IYA RAN, 1996. S. 67–96(In Russian).
6. Krasnyh V. V. Etnopsiholingvistika i lingvokul'turologiya: Kurs lekcij [Ethnopsycholinguistics and lingvoculturology: lectures’ course. — M.: «Gnozis», 2002. — 284 s. (In Russian).
7. Lippman U. Obshchestvennoe mnenie [Public opinion] / pod red. K.A. Levinson, K.V. Petrenko; per. s angl. T.V. Barchunova. M.: Institut Fonda «Obshchestvennoe mnenie», 2004. 384 s. (In Russian).
8. YAdov V. A. Stereotip social'nyj [Stereotype social] // Filosofskij enciklopedicheskij slovar'; gl.red. L.F.Il'ichev. M.: Sov. Enciklopediya, 1989. 840 s. (In Russian).
Review
For citations:
Zakharchenko S.S. Thnophaulisms in the Context of Associative Experiment (Representation of Student Youth). Surgut State Pedagogical University Bulletin. 2023;(5 (86)):202-211. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26105/SSPU.2023.86.5.021
Views:
110
Email this article 