Information on the Delivery of Open Sheets as a Source for Studying the History of Archaeological Re-Search on the Territory of the Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Okrug — Yugra in Modern Times
https://doi.org/10.26105/SSPU.2023.3.84.013
Abstract
Recently, there has been an increase in the number of publications devoted to the history of archaeological research on the territory of separate subjects of Russia. In this aspect, the territory of KhMAO-Yugra is of no exception. One of the important sources for studying the history of archaeological research is information about the delivery of open sheets. Every year the number of publications based on these data increases. Up to now there are no similar studies on the history of archaeological research on the territory of KhMAO-Yugra.
Objective.This publication is an analysis of information on the delivery of open sheets as a source for studying the history of archaeological research on the territory of the Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Okrug-Yugra in recent times, in the period from 2012 to 2021.
The basis of the study is the data on the delivery of permits (open sheets) for the right to conduct field archaeological work on the territory of KhMAO-Yugra in open access, posted on the official Internet portal of the Ministry of Culture of the Russian Federation (https://culture. gov.ru /). The leading research method is a comparative analysis of tabular data.
For the first time, information on the delivery of open sheets for the right to conduct field archaeological research on the territory of the Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Okrug is being introduced into wide scientific circulation. Based on this information, a statistical analysis is provided, which allowed us to identify some of the main trends in the dynamics of the number of archaeological studies in the region in the general Russian context.
About the Author
I. V. Frolov
Limited liability Company «Scientific and Production Association «Northern Archaeology-1»
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Frolov Ivan Victorovich — Archaeologist
Nefteyugansk
References
1. Agarkova A. B. Arheologicheskie kollekcii muzeev Jugry: istorija komplek-tovanija i voprosy sovremennogo ucheta [Archaeological collections of Ugra mu-seums: the history of acquisition and issues of modern] // Arheologija Evrazijskih stepej. 2019. № 5. S. 30–40. (In Russian).
2. Vedmid' G.P., Bochkarev D. V. Dostoprimechatel'noe mesto «Barsova Gora» — unikal'nyj prirodno arheologicheskij pamjatnik Surgutskogo Priob'ja [The landmark "Barsova Gora" is a unique natural and archaeological monument of the Surgut Ob region] // Balandinskie chtenija: Sbornikstatej VIII nauchnyh chtenij pamjati S.N. Ba-landina. 2014. T.9. № 1. Novosibirsk. S. 30–44.(In Rus-sian).
3. Zajceva E. A., Kenig A. V., Sobol'nikova T. N. Arheologicheskij monitor-ing kakfaktorsohrannostiobjektovkul'turnogonasledija (pomaterialamrabot 2010–2012 godov v Hanty-Mansijskom avtonomnom okruge — Jugre) [Archaeological monitoring as a factor of preservation of cultural heritage objects (based on the materials of the 2010–2012 works in the Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Okrug — Yugra)] // Vestnik NGU. Ser.: Istorija, filologija. 2013. T.12. Vyp. 3. Arheologija i jetnografija. S. 86–92. (InRussian).
4. Zajceva E. A. Istorija arheologicheskih issledovanij Surgutskogo Priob'ja (1994–2010 gg.) [The history of archaeological research of the Surgut Ob region (1994–2010)] // Vestnikugrovedenija. 2013. № 2(12). S. 104–113. (In Russian)
5. Sobol'nikova T. N., Kuzina A. V., Muh'jarova A. R. Arheologicheskie is-sledo-vanija v nizhnemtechenii r. Konda: itogi polevogo sezona 2017 g. [Archaeological research in the lower reaches of the Konda River: results of the 2017 field season] // Vestnik ugrovedenija. 2017. T.7. № 4. S. 144–157. (In Russian).
6. Sorokina I. A. Imperatorskaja arheologicheskaja komissija i stanovle niepo-levyh issledovanij v otechestvennoj arheologii [The Imperial Archaeological Commission and the formation of field research in Russian archaeology] // Prob-lemy istorii, fi-lologii, kul'tury. 2009. № 4 (26). S. 13–21. (In Russian).
7. Sorokina I. A. Arheologija v zakonodatel'stve pervyh desjatiletij sovet-skoj vlasti [Archaeology in the Legislation of the first Decades of Soviet Power] // Izvestija Samarskogo nauchnogo centra Rossijskoj akademi inauk, Ser. Arhe-ologija i etnografija. 2015. T.17. № 3(2). S. 587–591.(In Russian).
8. Sorokina I. A. Pervye sovetskie instrukcii po provedeniju polevyh issle-dovanij pamjatnikov arheologii (1927 g.): k istorii sozdanija [The first Soviet in-structions for conducting field research of archaeological monuments (1927): to the history of creation] // Izvestija Samarskogo nauchnogo centra Rossijskoj akademii nauk, 2018. T.20. № 3(2). S. 537–543.(In Russian).
9. Feklova T. Ju. Otkrytyj list kak istochnik po istorii jekspedicii I.I. Re-dovskogo na severo-vostok Sibiri v 1805–1807 gg. [Open leaf as a source on the history of the I.I. Re-dovsky expedition to the northeast of Siberia in 1805–1807] // Materialy XXXII Krasheninnikovskie hchtenija. Petropavlovsk-Kamchatskij, 2015. S. 307–310. (In Russian).
Review
For citations:
Frolov I.V. Information on the Delivery of Open Sheets as a Source for Studying the History of Archaeological Re-Search on the Territory of the Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Okrug — Yugra in Modern Times. Surgut State Pedagogical University Bulletin. 2023;(3 (84)):47-52. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26105/SSPU.2023.3.84.013
Views:
129
Email this article 