Organization of Archeological Research in the Nefteyugansk District of Khmao-Yugra in the Conditions of Transformation of State-Legal Regulation in 1992–2002

The current state of protection of cultural heritage in general and archaeological in particular is largely due to the events of the past. The institutionalization and the very process of protecting cultural heritage is the formation of a socio-economic phenomenon, the production industry of modern Russia. It is possible to outline the main trends in the development of this process as an effective tool for scientifically based long-term strategic forecasting when studying the historical path of its folding.

In the early 1990s, regional institutes for the protection and study of archaeological heritage appear on the territory of KhMAO-Yugra. In the context of the socio-economic and political transformation of the country, it became necessary to preserve both the cultural heritage as a whole and the archaeological as an integral part of it. The peculiarity of the KhMAO was that the formation of such institutions began not “from above”, but “from below”. They were the first to appear in the Nefteyugansk and Soviet districts in 1992.

For the first time, the data of documents from the archive of the Nefteyugansk district of the Khanty-Mansiysk Autonomous Okrug, related to the research topic, are being introduced into wide scientific circulation. For the first time, the analysis of the relationship of the organizational structures of archaeological research on the territory of the Nefteyugansk region with the processes of socio-economic and state-legal transformations in the autonomous Okrug and the country as a whole is given.

1. Bogatyrev R. A., Demidov A. G. Istoriya zakonodatel’nyh izmenenij v sfere sohraneniya istoriko-kul’turnogo naslediya RSFSR v 1980-e gg. [The history of legislative changes in the field of preservation of the historical and cultural heritage of the RSFSR in the 1980s.] // Istoriya: fakty i simvoly. № 1 (22), 2020. S. 133–139. (In Russian).

2. Gusev S. V., Zagorul’ko A. V. Osnovnye napravleniya i metody ohrany ar-heologicheskogo naslediya Rossii v 1980-e — 1990-e gg. [The main directions and methods of protecting the archaeological heritage of Russia in the 1980s — 1990s.] // Arheologicheskij faktor v planirovochnoj organizacii territorii: Materialy seminara. M.: Institut naslediya, 1997. S. 236–243. (In Russian).

3. Kargin Yu. Yu. Stanovlenie i evolyuciya gosudarstvennoj koncepcii ohrany, issledovaniya i ispol’zovaniya pamyatnikov arheologii v sovetskij period (1945–1991 GG.) [Formation and evolution of the state concept of protection, research and use of archaeological monuments in the Soviet period (1945–1991)] // Izvestiya Samarskogo nauchnogo centra Rossij-skoj akademii nauk, t. 11, № 2, 2009. S. 274–280. (In Russian).

4. Leonov S. Nasledie Yugry. 10 let centru sohraneniya istoriko-kul’turnogo naslediya HMAO-Yugry

5. [The Legacy of Ugra. 10 years of the center for the preservation of the historical and cultural heritage of KhMAO-Yugra] // Istoriko-kul’turnyj zhurnal «Nashe nasledie». 2007. № 83–84. URL: http://nasledie-rus.ru/podshivka/8332.php (data obrashheniya 30.09.2022). (In Russian).

6. Monastyryov M. M. Dvizhimye ob”ekty kul’turnogo naslediya: Osobennosti zakonodatel’nogo regulirovaniya [Movable objects of cultural heritage: Features of legislative regulation] // Sovremennoe pravo. № 6, 2015. S. 66–75. (In Russian).

7. Nikiforova A. A. Osobennosti sohraneniya kul’turnogo i prirodnogo naslediya v regionah (na primere Hanty-Mansijskogo avtonomnogo okruga-Yugry) [Features of preservation of cultural and natural heritage in the regions (on the example of the Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Okrug-Yugra)] // Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Vyp. 20. Filosofiya. Sociologiya. Kul’turologiya. № 2 (217), 2011. S. 106–110. (In Russian).

8. Safronova A. M. Organizacionno-pravovye osnovy mestnogo samoupravleniya v Rossijskoj Federacii: Uchebnoe posobie [Organizational and legal foundations of local self-government in Russian Federation: Textbook]. Ekaterinburg: Izd-vo Ural. Un-ta, 2019. 139 s. (In Russian).

9. Severnaya arheologiya [Northern archeology] / Edited by G. P. Vizgalov, O. V. Kardasha. Nefteyugansk, Ekaterinburg: Izd-vo AMB, 2010. 112 s. (In Russian).

10. Sorokina I. A. Polevye arheologicheskie issledovaniya v Rossii v 1946–2006 gg. (po arhivnym materialam i publikaciyam) [Field archaeological research in Russia in 1946–2006 (based on archival materials and publications)] Tula: Grif i K, 2008. 244 s. (In Russian).

11. Yakovlev Ya. A. Istoricheskaya spravka ob ohrane istoriko-kul’turnogo naslediya na territorii Hanty-Mansijskogo avtonomnogo okruga — Yugry [Historical information on the protection of historical and cultural heritage on the territory of the Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Okrug — Yugra]. 2008. URL: http://hmao.kaisa.ru/object/1810977680?|c=ru (data obrashheniya 30.09.2022). (In Russian).